When thefamilymember who held everyone like glue passes away, all sorts of conflict tend to arise. One that many might not think about is disagreeing on how the person’s ashes will be shared. While this might sound strange, the rise of people who choose to becrematedis closely tied to the rise of such family disputes.
Scroll down to find the full story and a conversation with Adam Binstock, a funeral, cremation, and memorial expert and founder ofthe Cremation Institute, Caleb Klein, a licensed funeral director and funeral celebrancy expert atLoving Ceremony, andMallory Greene, co-founder and CEO ofEirene, an innovative funeral services company, who kindly agreed to tell us more about sharing loved one’s ashes.
RELATED:
After a family member passes, one conflict that might unexpectedly arise is how to share their ashes
Image credits:Iakobchuk / Envato (not the actual photo)
These siblings also ran into this question, but one of them refused to split mom’s remains with the other
Image credits:LightFieldStudios / Envato (not the actual photo)
Image credits:New_Imagination1109
Nowadays, around 60% of people choose to be cremated
Image credits:syda_productions / Freepik (not the actual photo)
Unfortunately, the rise of people who choose to be cremated poses quite a unique problem—family members are increasingly getting involved in disputes about sharing the person’s remains. In fact,Witan Solicitorsreport that a fifth of all funeral conflicts are related to where the deceased ashes or body will go.
Caleb Klein, a licensed funeral director and funeral celebrancy expert atLoving Ceremony, says that typically the right to an individual’s cremated remains follows the legal next-of-kin hierarchy. “In the simplest form, whoever has the legal authority to make funeral arrangements—a spouse, adult child, or other designated executor—is the person who makes the decision about who will receive the cremated remains after cremation. It is worth noting that a person’s written wishes in a will or pre-arrangements should be honored, whenever possible,” he noted.
It’s also perfectly fine to share the ashes amongst the people the late was very close with. “If, for example, a parent passes away and there’s a number of children, the ashes are commonly shared evenly amongst them. This can also extend on occasions to other family members or even friends, if the deceased was very close to them. Sometimes the person in charge will use a portion of the ashes to create a series of memorials like keepsake urns or jewelry pieces for family members,” told Adam Binstock, a funeral, cremation, and memorial expert and founder ofthe Cremation Institute, toBored Panda.
“There are no universal legal restrictions against this, but cultural, religious, or personal beliefs may influence whether it’s considered appropriate,” addsMallory Greene, co-founder and CEO ofEirene, an innovative funeral services company.
“If a religion supports cremation, it is usually acceptable to divide cremated remains, however the Catholic church offers guidelines that prohibit the separation of cremated remains. Communication is important, making sure to have an open discussion among key family members to ensure all are comfortable with the decision,” additionally notes Klein.
“Disputes over ashes can be emotionally charged, often stemming from differing beliefs and personal connections”
Image credits:zinkevych / Freepik (not the actual photo)
If someone is unhappy with the decision to split loved one’s ashes, Binstock suggests that to resolve the dispute, sincerity and respect are the best solutions. “Don’t go into the conversation in a confrontational or judgmental way. Explain to them what the person meant to you and why you want a portion of their ashes to remember them will go a long way. I would also explain what you intend to do with the ashes, like spread them or infuse them in a memorial ring.”
Meanwhile, Greene says, “Disputes over ashes can be emotionally charged, often stemming from differing beliefs, personal connections, or unclear directives from the deceased. The best approach is open communication and compromise. If disagreements persist, mediation with afuneraldirector, religious leader, or legal professional may help. In extreme cases, courts can intervene, though this is a last resort. To avoid conflict, pre-planning and clearly documented wishes are ideal.”
“To help alleviate fractures between surviving family, sharing portions of the cremated remains or incorporating them into other memorial options like glass art or as part of a memorial tree planting may help,” adds Klein.
“One thing I would always encourage people to keep in mind is that cremated remains represent much more than just physical remains—they hold a deepemotionalor symbolic meaning. Whatever disposition is decided upon, those choices should reflect love, respect, and honor the unique life that was lived. Take the time to make thoughtful decisions that will ensure all involved are part of creating a lasting, meaningful tribute to their loved one,” he concludes.
Some readers believed the sibling was right to deny brother of their mom’s ashes
Wile others had the opposite opinion
Thanks! Check out the results:Gabija Saveiskyte
Rugilė Žemaitytė
Ilona Baliūnaitė
Relationships
