Finding a job is a tough task. You seem to send endless streams ofresumesand cover letters to get at least a few interviews. And even when all of this goes smoothly, there might still be stuff that comes up and ruins it all.
Today’s story is a perfect example of this. In it, the person went through the whole process of getting a nice job with adequate pay. Sadly, it all went away quickly when it was revealed that the company wasn’t keeping its promises.
More info:Reddit
RELATED:
Getting a job is a tough task that takes a long time, and even after all that effort, it can end up being fruitless
Image credits:Los Muertos Crew (not the actual photo)
A person who applied was interviewed for a job that promised to pay the highest salary in their offered range
Image credits:Tima Miroshnichenko (not the actual photo)
But then, when the company offered them a job, they told them that they would pay only the lowest amount
Image credits:u/QueensOfTheThrownAge
So, instead of letting the company lowball them, the person said that if they’re going to get a low salary, they’re going to put little effort into the job
Today’s OP applied for a great-sounding job. This job’s posting specified what kind ofsalarythey would offer candidates. The original poster didn’t specifically mention exact numbers — instead, they dubbed it in the $X-Y range.
Nowadays, more and more places are legally requiring employers to provide information about salaries in job postings. For example, in The European Union’s Pay Transparency Act, there’s apointabout pay transparency for job-seekers. It demands that employers provide information about the initial pay level or its range in the job description or at least before the job interview.
Staying compliant with the legal requirements isn’t the only benefit of including a salary in the job description. This type oftransparencyhelps the company to appear more transparent, strengthen its trustworthiness, and empower progress toward pay equality.
Yet, it doesn’t ban employers from asking about candidates’ salary expectations.Some say that thisquestionis one of the hardest to answer during job interviews. If a candidate says a number that is too small, they might end up making less than the company was willing to pay. And if they go too high, they can price themselves out of the job.
During their phoneinterview, the OP was asked this difficult question. They gave their response and were promised to be paid the largest amount of the offered range if they passed the interview process. For this to happen, they were invited to an in-person interview, during which they were offered a job. But that wasn’t the end.
Image credits:fauxels (not the actual photo)
Apparently, the company wasn’t planning to keep their promise. Instead of the highest amount in their range, they offered the lowest one. Their justification was that it was the only amount that fit the OP’s experience level. As our interviewee pointed out, there are no laws thatprevent employers from offering salaries below market.
However, candidates should keep in mind that there are anti-discrimination laws. They prohibit employers from giving lower salaries to certain groups of people that fall into the protected categories of gender expression, sexual orientation, disability, and many others. “So, for instance, if an employer habitually lowballs women, paying them less, and habitually pays men more, that would be unlawful.”
If the candidate believes that they were lowballed because of the above reasons, they should seek a legal consultation from an employment attorney or even a government agency and learn about their rights. “This would help them determine if they can bring a discrimination claim against the employer.”
While the reason why the company tried lowballing the author isn’t that clear, they still weren’tplanning to give in.They brought up the fact that it wasn’t the amount they were promised. They also cheekily added that if the company is planning to pay a low salary, they will put little effort into thejob. You know, in the ballpark of treating others how you want to be treated.
At first, the recruiter took it as ajoke, but they soon realized that the original poster wasn’t joking. It’s no surprise that the interview didn’t go much further.
Even though they didn’t get the job, they were able to see a silver lining in the whole situation. They felt like they gave “those LinkedIn weirdos” a dose of reality. People on Reddit agreed with this sentiment. They found the idea of “minimum pay, minimum effort” quite an ingenious way of negotiating. After all,negotiationis probably the best way to avoid getting lowballed on the pay you want.
Check out our interviewee’sInstagramandTikTok!
People online praised the person for not letting a scammy company walk all over them
Image credits:Sora Shimazaki (not the actual photo)
Image credits:Christina Morillo (not the actual photo)
Thanks! Check out the results:
Work & Money
