More than half a century has passed since DNApaternity testswith a high degree of reliability became widely available to people, and since then their use has left a double effect. As, incidentally, with any invention – there will always be people who will use even the most remarkable achievement of science to harm.
More info:Reddit
RELATED:
The author of the post is a single mom whose husband divorced her wrongly, accusing her of infidelity
Image credits:yanalya (not the actual photo)
The man’s only relative who actually sided with the woman was his sister
Image credits:sundontshine23
Image credits:freepik (not the actual photo)
Some time later, the sister told the ex that the boy was his spitting image – and the ensuing paternity test proved it
Image credits:Karolina Kaboompics (not the actual photo)
The guy got his visitations – but the mom always tried to avoid him
At the meeting in the man’s office, he tried to manipulate her – and she snapped at him, airing out his dirty laundry in the crowded space
So, meet the Original Poster (OP) – a single mom, whose husbanddivorced herbecause for some reason he was almost sure that the son she gave birth to was not his. Of course, the divorce process turned into a real passage through all the circles of hell for the new mom, but she endured it.
She probably told her brother about it, showed him the photos – and suddenly this man appeared in the author’s life again. This time with a demand to do apaternity test. Our heroine agreed and – surprise – it turned out that the child was his biological son.
Now the guy gets visitations, but the mom sincerely admits that during his visits she tries to avoid the company of her ex. He, in turn, once even called and asked, as if nothing had happened, why she was avoiding him. Then a scandal was avoided, but it was obviously brewing…
The former spouses agreed to meet to discuss thefinancial aspectsof their son’s upbringing – and the man invited her to his office. And so, during the conversation, the guy again started talking about what mistakes they (yes, that was his wording!) made in the past. And in general, that, in his opinion, it was worth discarding the past and going back to how things were before.
And here the author’s patience snapped. She started speaking in a raised voice, getting more and more heated with each new remark, unleashing all the bitterness that had accumulated over a long time on the person who, due to incomprehensible suspicions, had nearly ruined her life.
The ex tried to calm her down – but this only provoked the OP. She was already screaming at the top of her lungs, not embarrassed that his employees were on the other side of the wall and that she literally aired his dirty laundry out to them. And only after she had splashed out all her anger did she leave.
After some time, the ex called back and criticized her for ’embarrassing’ him in front of his own employees, and that now they might think God knows what about him. So the woman decided to find out the opinion of people online on whether she did the wrong thing here.
“In this situation, it seems to me, the man acted inappropriately from the very beginning, and continued to do ugly things afterwards,” says Irina Matveeva, apsychologistand certified NLP specialist, whomBored Pandaasked for a comment here. “He made abig mistake, and when this became clear, he started attempts to manipulate his ex-wife.”
“A classic example is an attempt to ‘divide’ the responsibility for what happened between the two of them, although, according to this woman, he was the only one to blame for the divorce. An attempt to belittle the emotional and moral damage he caused to her and their child is completely inappropriate as well.”
“What kind of nerves of steel do you need to have in order not to lose your temper after something like this? I’m only surprised that this woman endured it for so long. And the fact that this scandal happened in the office – well, he invited her there himself. And now the employees will also know what he is like…” Irina summarizes.
As for the commenters to the original post, they also sided with the author en masse. “If he didn’t want to have a high-emotion conversation with his ex-wife at his workplace, then he shouldn’t have had it at his workplace,” one of the responders wrote. “What happened because the meeting in his office is his problem,” another one added.
Thanks! Check out the results:
Relationships
