How long do you need to look at a picture before you get what’s going on in it, Pandas? According toresearchers at MIT, the human brain can process visuals in 13 milliseconds. So, you’re supposed to get what’s in aphotographbefore you even blink.But is that really the case with the pics from the r/hmmm subreddit? They usually haveno context, feature some detail that’s just a tad bit off, or confuse you in general. If you’re a fan of weird stuff on the Internet, you’ll probably appreciate this newest collection of random as heck pics, so, scroll away!More info:RedditThis post may includeaffiliate links.
How long do you need to look at a picture before you get what’s going on in it, Pandas? According toresearchers at MIT, the human brain can process visuals in 13 milliseconds. So, you’re supposed to get what’s in aphotographbefore you even blink.
But is that really the case with the pics from the r/hmmm subreddit? They usually haveno context, feature some detail that’s just a tad bit off, or confuse you in general. If you’re a fan of weird stuff on the Internet, you’ll probably appreciate this newest collection of random as heck pics, so, scroll away!
More info:Reddit
This post may includeaffiliate links.
RELATED:
13 milliseconds are hardly enough to fully understand the pics from the r/hmmmsubreddit. You might need to do some double or triple takes to fully get the meaning and notice what’s really going on there. But people like that kind of stuff on the internet: the r/hmmm subreddit has over two million followers (or internet aesthetes, as they call themselves).If you’re unsure what qualifies fora “hmmm” image, the subreddit has some guidelines. They claim that hmmms are supposed to be textless and rely on the visual only. A good hmmm, according to the subreddit, will “make you think about the context, do a double take, invoke a deeper meaning, or just leave you thinking about how or why they exist.”
13 milliseconds are hardly enough to fully understand the pics from the r/hmmmsubreddit. You might need to do some double or triple takes to fully get the meaning and notice what’s really going on there. But people like that kind of stuff on the internet: the r/hmmm subreddit has over two million followers (or internet aesthetes, as they call themselves).
If you’re unsure what qualifies fora “hmmm” image, the subreddit has some guidelines. They claim that hmmms are supposed to be textless and rely on the visual only. A good hmmm, according to the subreddit, will “make you think about the context, do a double take, invoke a deeper meaning, or just leave you thinking about how or why they exist.”
On the weird side of the internet, ripe with communities like r/lowrescrops, r/internet funeral, and r/mildlyinteresting, the r/hmmm subreddit stands out for its dedication to aesthetics. “hmmmsshould be aesthetic and meaningful, avoid anything that is merely r/mildlyinteresting,” the subreddit’s bio states.It’s no surprise, then, that the community has “internet as an art” in its description. Thus is the art of the internet:random, nonsensical, sometimes confusing, self-referential, and doused in sarcasm. So what if it takes us a few moments to understand what’s happening in a picture? We’ve got nothing but time to procrastinate when we’re online, right?
On the weird side of the internet, ripe with communities like r/lowrescrops, r/internet funeral, and r/mildlyinteresting, the r/hmmm subreddit stands out for its dedication to aesthetics. “hmmmsshould be aesthetic and meaningful, avoid anything that is merely r/mildlyinteresting,” the subreddit’s bio states.
It’s no surprise, then, that the community has “internet as an art” in its description. Thus is the art of the internet:random, nonsensical, sometimes confusing, self-referential, and doused in sarcasm. So what if it takes us a few moments to understand what’s happening in a picture? We’ve got nothing but time to procrastinate when we’re online, right?
If we were to treat these confusing images as art, then there’s no shame in having to look at them just a bit longer than usual. Yet that’s not to say that people tend to look at paintings for very long. One survey, for example,foundthat people look at a painting for an average of 17 seconds.
The Louvre claims that most visitorslookat the Mona Lisa for about 15, and a survey from the MET found that people look at an artwork for about 32.5 seconds. Do those 17 or 32.5 seconds allow us to fully understand a work of art? Depends on the person, of course, but the same goes for confusing internet images.
Our brains might be able to categorize the objects in a photograph in milliseconds, yet we’re not quite able to understand its full meaning that fast. Just like we need to look at a painting for longer than 30 seconds, we might need longer for that meme or confusing pic in order for our brains to be able to decipher it.
The way we see and interpret images is quite fascinating in general. The amount of things that happen all around us and bombard our visual senses is enormous. Our eyes also don’t see a stable image all the time: we walk, move our heads and eyes, and even blink, so, the visual inputchanges constantly. Yet why is the image of the world around us always so stable?
In 2022,researcherswere able to somewhat answer that question. Our brain doesn’t analyze every single visual snapshot. Instead, it has a stabilization mechanism. Our brains perceive the average of what our eyes have seen in the last 15 seconds. It’s sort of like living in the past: the brain consolidates all the visual input it receives into one impression every 15 seconds.
Trying to interpret every single visual stimulus that happens around us all the time would simply make us go mad. “If our brains were always updating in real time, the world would feel like a chaotic place with constant fluctuations in light, shadow and movement,” the study’s authorswrote. “We would feel like we were hallucinating all the time.”
See Also on Bored Panda
Continue reading with Bored Panda PremiumUnlimited contentAd-free browsingDark modeSubscribe nowAlready a subscriber?Sign In
Continue reading with Bored Panda Premium
Unlimited contentAd-free browsingDark mode
Unlimited content
Ad-free browsing
Dark mode
Subscribe nowAlready a subscriber?Sign In
Modal closeAdd New ImageModal closeAdd Your Photo To This ListPlease use high-res photos without watermarksOoops! Your image is too large, maximum file size is 8 MB.Not your original work?Add sourcePublish
Modal close
Add New ImageModal closeAdd Your Photo To This ListPlease use high-res photos without watermarksOoops! Your image is too large, maximum file size is 8 MB.Not your original work?Add sourcePublish
Modal closeAdd Your Photo To This ListPlease use high-res photos without watermarksOoops! Your image is too large, maximum file size is 8 MB.Not your original work?Add sourcePublish
Add Your Photo To This ListPlease use high-res photos without watermarksOoops! Your image is too large, maximum file size is 8 MB.
Add Your Photo To This List
Please use high-res photos without watermarks
Ooops! Your image is too large, maximum file size is 8 MB.
Not your original work?Add source
Modal closeModal closeOoops! Your image is too large, maximum file size is 8 MB.UploadUploadError occurred when generating embed. Please check link and try again.TwitterRender conversationUse html versionGenerate not embedded versionAdd watermarkInstagramShow Image OnlyHide CaptionCropAdd watermarkFacebookShow Image OnlyAdd watermarkChangeSourceTitleUpdateAdd Image
Modal closeOoops! Your image is too large, maximum file size is 8 MB.UploadUploadError occurred when generating embed. Please check link and try again.TwitterRender conversationUse html versionGenerate not embedded versionAdd watermarkInstagramShow Image OnlyHide CaptionCropAdd watermarkFacebookShow Image OnlyAdd watermarkChangeSourceTitleUpdateAdd Image
Upload
UploadError occurred when generating embed. Please check link and try again.TwitterRender conversationUse html versionGenerate not embedded versionAdd watermarkInstagramShow Image OnlyHide CaptionCropAdd watermarkFacebookShow Image OnlyAdd watermark
Error occurred when generating embed. Please check link and try again.
TwitterRender conversationUse html versionGenerate not embedded versionAdd watermark
InstagramShow Image OnlyHide CaptionCropAdd watermark
FacebookShow Image OnlyAdd watermark
ChangeSourceTitle
You May Like40 Images So Weird They Need Jesus, As Shared By The “Weird Images Worth Seeing” Online GroupMantas Kačerauskas30 Absurd Images That Might Leave You Wondering What’s Going On (New Pics)Indrė Lukošiūtė50 Hilariously Absurd Random Pics That Hit Like A Drunk Text At 3 AMIlona Baliūnaitė
Mantas Kačerauskas
Indrė Lukošiūtė
Ilona Baliūnaitė
Funny